Case 278 vs. Case 279

My Issue With Case 278 and Case 279

I’m a bit confused. What’s the difference between each Case, exactly? By how each is worded, they don’t appear to be significantly different from one another:

Case 278

The service is not responsible for linked or (clearly) quoted content from third-party content providers

Case 279

This service assumes no responsibility and liability for the contents of links to other websites


What should we do?

4 Answers

4

I thought the same thing, I was just going to ask about this

@Clippy Which one do you think is more useful?

I like Case 279 more, I don’t know which is more useful.

Agreed. Also, Case 278 lacks a description.

Which Case shall we stick with?
  • Case 278
  • Case 279
0 voters