I agree with most of these changes, they have much more sense. However, I don’t see why this one should be in the Content Topic, since it’s linked to a use of the service in a manner that causes bandwidth problems for instance, rather than linked to content posted.
@Arlo I’m proposing to deprecate the Users agree not to submit illegal content case, and replace it with the Users agree not to use the service for illegal purposes.
I believe those two cases coexisting is a bit redundant, since posting illegal content, by itself, is an illegal action/purpose for which the service would be used for. Thus the prohibition for illegal content seems kind of implicit.
@Agnes_de_Lion It’s more of a pragmatic change, as the Content Topic contains mostly things users can and cannot do, along with Suspension & Censorship. I’m arguing this due to the general practical advantages about said topic.
— Sidenote: it’s also a proposal in the making to rename the Content Topic to something more specific that would allow an easier location for cases. —
