How should we handle CalOPPA?

Description

I’ve noted an increasing amount of Privacy Policies mentioning CalOPPA (California Online Privacy Protection Act). This makes me scratch my head as to how should we proceed with this.

Solution 1: Create a new Case

Name: The service claims to be CalOPPA compliant for California users

This is probably a more robust, though cumbersome solution. Nevertheless, it can be done in we want to differentiate between CCPA and CalOPPA.

Solution 2: Reword Case 482

Case 482 is currently:

The service claims to be CCPA compliant for California users

We could add CalOPPA as an alternative in the Case name:

The service claims to be CCPA/CalOPPA compliant for California users

Initially, this option is a no-brainer. However, this could be ambiguous for services that ONLY comply with one and not both. Of course, we can rely on reviewers on Phoenix to change the Point title if necessary, but this is bound to be a lengthier process as some users might not be aware of this solution.


What are your thoughts on this?