Case 164 is linked to points giving a service the right to disclose personal data of a user if a government requests it.
However, the current phrasing of the case is ambiguous and doesn’t take into account the reasons of the disclosure :
This service reserves the right to disclose your personal information without notifying you
(Topic Law and Government requests)
I propose rephrasing the case to
Your personal data may be disclosed to comply with government requests without notice to you
What are your thoughts?