Why is Case 188 Bad

Why is Case 188 Bad, I feel like it should be neutral because a lot of the time this case is used is because the service shares your data for payments.

@SoleClaw has a point, and I believe it was the reasoning the community had when creating this Case.

Nevertheless, we could lower the penalty to 10 (current is 35, which isn’t that high either way).

@curators @verified-curators @staff @Team @moderators @developers @donator @trust_level_1 (SORRY FOR THE PING!)

What should we do with Case 188?

  • Change it to “Neutral” (:neutral:)
  • Lower its weight to a certain amount
  • Do Nothing
  • Other Solution (COMMENT BELOW)
0 voters