Some bad marks are unfairly critical of free/libre/open terms

case-139: Your content can be distributed through any media known now or in the future

Taken from Github:

For example Point 22685 (ToS;DR Phoenix)

This might be a poor specific in the terms, but wouldn’t this be just the same as Wikipedia or any other thing that is under CC BY-SA or similar free/libre/open terms?

I suggest it’s wrong to label a service’s terms as bad because it’s a wiki and the licensing is FLO.

1 Like